Question 1

A UK manufacturing company has simultaneously:
* purchased a put option to sell USD 1million at an exercise price of GBP1.00 = USD1.65
* sold a call option that grants the option holder the right to buy USD 1million at a price of GBP1.00 = USD1.61(this option has the same maturity date as the put).
Which of the following is a valid explanation for entering into these option positions?

Options :

A : The company expects to receive USD 1million from a customer and wishes to offset the cost of the put option by the premium on the call option.

B : The company expects to pay USD 1million to a supplier and wishes to offset the premium from the call option against the cost of the put option.

C : The company expects to receive USD 1million from a customer and wishes to obtain an additional benefit if the USD strengthens beyond GBP 1.00 = USD 1.61.

D : The company expects to pay USD 1million to a supplier and wishes to obtain additional protection against the USD strengthening beyond GBP 1.00 = USD 1.65.

Answer: A

Question 2

M plc is an IT company thatbids for large contracts to sell computer systems and also to serviceexisting systems. M plc's senior management hasalwayssetbudgets which are hard to achieve andhavemade no allowances for the recession.
The economy has improved andM plc's senior managershave made the budget even more optimistic. The budgetedsalestargethas been increased by 40%.
In the past,sales staffhave not tried to achievethe budgetsales because itwas generallybelieved that the targets wereimpossible to reach.
M plc has recently appointed a new Sales Directorwhohas decided that sales staff will bedismissedif they fail to meet sales targets for three successive months. He is also looking forhighersalesmargins than wereachievedbefore.
What are the likely consequences ofthe new Sales Director'spolicy?

Options :

A : Sales staff will be happier in their jobs.

B : Sales staff will tender for riskier contracts.

C : Sales staff will encroach on other sales staff territories to get more work.

D : Sales staff will look for new jobs.

E : Sales staff will feel more settled and secure in their jobs.

Answer: B,C,D

Question 3

The internal audit department has just completed an investigation into the HR department's procedures relating to new staff appointments The head of HR is unhappy with the draft report prepared by the lead internal auditor The report lists several cases in which appointments were made despite the fact that one or more of the entity's formal procedures were not followed
The head of HR has complained that the internal auditor's comments do not allow for the fact that the HR department's staff members are often very busy and do not always have time to conduct every check.
The internal auditor's comments also reflect a failure to complete documents None of the omissions have led to the appointment of an unsuitable member of staff
Which TWO of the following statements reflect an appropriate response by the board of directors to this report?

Options :

A : Ignoring a compliance error altogether may undermine the control environment

B : The procedures should be removed if the HR department staff believe that they are unnecessary

C : The board should be seen to support the internal audit

D : The errors are immaterial because they did not lead to an inappropriate appointment

E : The members of staff responsible for these omissions should be subjected to disciplinary action

Answer: A,C

Question 4

A has an opportunity to invest $90,000 in a project that is expected to generate annual cash inflows of $60,000 for each of the next three years. The project's beta coefficient implies a discount rate of 12% for this project, based on a risk-free rate of return of 3%.
A is prepared to forego the expected cash flows from this project in return for a guaranteed payment of $50,000 at the end of year 1, $42,000 at the end of year 2 and $30,000 at the end of year 3.
What is the certainty equivalent value of this opportunity to A?

Options :

A : $9,493

B : $25,606

C : $54,120

D : $115,606

Answer: B

Question 5

GHY is a listed company. Tom isGHY'sCEO and Peter isitsnon-executive Chair of the Board. Tom and Peterbothhave substantial relevant business and industrial experience andboth are believed to have considerable integrity. Tom and Peter quickly developed a good working relationship after Peter's appointment. They have become close friends.
Tom briefs Peter on every aspect of the business. Tom and Peter jointlyagreethe agenda foreveryboard meetingandboth agree on the manner in which matterswill be presented to theboard.
Taking account of the principles of goodcorporategovernance, which of the following statements is correct?

Options :

A : It is entirely appropriate that Tom and Peter have this kind of relationship and both are acting in the best interests of the company

B : Non-contentious board meetings show how well Tom and Peter are running the company and shows that the management is cohesive.

C : The relationship between Peter and Tom may have a detrimental effect on company decision making as the Boardis not always being informed about matters in an unbiased manner.

D : Since the non-executive chair clearly has a significant role within this company there is little danger that any individual will become excessively dominant.

Answer: C

Confidently Practice Online with Free CIMAPRA19-P03-1-ENG Exam Cram

Buying Options: